Thursday, April 13, 2006

Tanya Kach Isn't Lying

You've probably heard something about Tanya Kach, the 24-year-old woman from McKeesport, Pennsylvania who claimed she was held captive by a middle-aged man for the past 10 years. To me, this story was disturbing but unsurprising. I was stunned to learn that many people are skeptical of Kach's story, insisting that it's impossible to hide a teen/adult captive in a smallish two-story house (her alleged captor, Thomas Hose, lived with his parents) and that if this really happened, Kach would have gone to the police as soon as she was released. A bizarre article at the Court TV website Crime Library even contrasts Tanya's captivity with the scenario in John Fowles's 1963 novel The Collector, pointing out that Miranda didn't behave the same way Tanya did.
But this kind of thing has happened before, and few of the abductors and victims behaved like the characters in Fowles's novel (which I have read several times; frankly, I think it's more about gender and class warfare than abduction, anyway).
Back in the '80s, 20-year-old Colleen Stan was abducted while hitchhiking and held captive in the mobile home of Cameron and Janice Hooker for 7 years; for much of that time, she was confined to a specially made, coffin-like box beneath the Hookers' bed, not far away from the Hookers' small child. After 7 years of constant torture and threats, Colleen Stan was so beaten down that she didn't seek help even when Cameron Hooker began to trust her to leave the house unaccompanied;
she suspected it was a test, that she was being followed by the Hookers.
More recently, eccentric multi-millionaire John Jamelske abducted 5 girls and women and confined them in his basement for up to 2.5 years. His sick wife was upstairs throughout this time but suspected nothing. One victim told police what had happened and provided specific details about her abductor; they didn't believe her. Another young victim didn't report her crime until Jamelske was arrested, believing in his repeated threats to harm her and her family if she did.
Elizabeth Smart was so convinced by Brian David Mitchell's threats to harm her family that she denied she was Elizabeth Smart when questioned by police. Asked to take off her large sunglasses, she said she couldn't because she'd just had eye surgery. Only under intense questioning from multiple officers did she finally mutter, "If thou sayeth."
This isn't necessarily "Stockholm syndrome." Sometimes it's just fear. If a victim, particularly a young and impressionable victim, is told countless times that she and her family will be harmed or even killed, they begin to believe it beyond a shadow of a doubt. In fact, the woman who seemingly collaborated with the robber holding her hostage in a Stockholm Bank says she didn't have "Stockholm syndrome" either - she was pretending to be helpful only to buy time for herself and the other hostages. Patty Hearst says she was coerced into everything she did, too, but the grin on her face in SLA photos says she probably did come to genuinely empathize with her captors. Maybe Stockholm Syndrome should be re-christened Hearst Syndrome.
OK, so it's possible to cow a victim into keeping quiet. But is it possible to confine someone to a second-floor room without everyone in the household knowing about it? Again, this has happened before. From 1903 to 1922, Mrs. Walburga Oesterreich managed to conceal her much younger lover in the attics of two different homes without her husband finding out (he encountered the other man in the kitchen once in 1918, but assumed he was a burglar).
Given these examples, Tanya Kach's story isn't incredible, but sadly familiar. She became Thomas Hose's "girlfriend" when she was just 14 and he was a 38-year-old, well-liked security guard at her school. Several people were aware of the relationship and did nothing to prevent it. After convincing her to run away from home and move into his parents' home secretly, Hose kept Tanya confined and repeatedly threatened to harm her family and friends if she ever tried to escape. It's tragic that after going through all this, she has to face the skepticism of a jaded and ignorant public.

9 comments:

tshsmom said...

Isn't that Fowles?

S.M. Elliott said...

Whoops. Yeah. ;P

Anonymous said...

It is very obvious, that Thomas used his age and experience to groom and seduce this emotionally neglected young girl...We can all understand his control over her, even without the treat of violence.
She had no family to run away to! All the people that are insisting on vilifying her should be ashamed and Tanya would do best to move away and put this in the past. A new life she can make and enjoy nut not with all those awful nasty sceptics trying to drag her down. Her parents and I mean all three should be ashamed that their daughter wanted to run away because of their inability to parent.

Anonymous said...

confined? neighbours knew she was living there, on the documentary they are interviewed saying they saw a woman in the bedroom loads of times but she never looked anything but content. it would have been easy for tanya to leave if she wanted. She thought of mr hose as her hero and so its her idiocy that landed her in that situation, but her continued happiness with it that kept her there. she hid herself. she is not a victim

Anonymous said...

She was 14, and he was a father-figure, which made her vulnerable to him. also if you have never been in a situation like that, you are not allowed to say things like 'she could easily have left' or 'the neighbors said she looked content' because the neighbors might be covering for themselves

Anonymous said...

Oh this is bull & Tanya is the worlds biggest lier...I lived in mckeesport & seen Tanya plenty of times sitting on the porch walking down the street, once I seen her hugging & kissing Tom right on the side walk...I seen them out many many times together & by herself...she is a lier!! Karma. That's whats in store for Lying Tanya..he didn't have control over her or her mind...poor Thomas Hose for ever meeting the monstercTanya Kach!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Thats wrong she had plenty of family right up the street!!! She is not a victom thomas hose & his family is a victom of tanya kach... she is a monster that picked to be with tom & picked to stay there because she didn't want to follow her parents rules shes a monster.. that fooled all you!!!!

Anonymous said...

What's really interesting to me is there are people blaming the father and step-mother for this "sadistic" little snot nose brats problems. Did anyone ever realize that it was of her own free will to run away numerous times and didn't abide by the rules that the parents had in place. Maybe the step-mother had enough of the BS that this chick was causing in the home. In the book and the documentary, did Tanya, herself, say that her biological mother tried to kill her and abuse her when she was little. Did anyone ever think that maybe, just maybe, that Tanya is saying that her father and step-mother never cared about her, but in actuality her biological mother "didn't care about her." Why did the father have custody of Tanya and not her mother?? Does anyone have any knowledge of that and can give me an insight on it. I'm just curious as to why her "mother" wasn't mentioned on Dr. Phil's and in the documentary. All she does is run her father and step-mother down. This is just mind boggling and don't understand why she returned to them after release if she claims that they didn't care about her! If it were me in that situation, they would be the last people that I would be going back to.

Unknown said...

I'm sitting here watching her on a show called .I survived .Yes that man was in the wrong because she was under age .But it looks like she was there on her free will .There was couple of things that she said in the story that made her look Bad.One of them when she always said she was always by herself but locked in her bedroom every day but then she says well one day I would be sitting in the bedroom all by myself when Tom was at work ,I would say to myself should I go downstairs and go tell his parents ??? I thought she was locked in there ?? At the end when she said that when the Sheriff was there and asked her what is her name so they went upstairs to talk to Tom the police and she said that Tom said to Her what's going on Kitty ? And she said that he was Thinking that she was going to deffend him .Why would he think like that ??? Doesn't look good .I think she wanted to b there .