Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Two Cents

One of today's political cartoons showed 7 newspapers, one for each day of the week, all bearing the headline "Dozens Killed - Iraq." The caption was "A Virginia Tech massacre every day."
The message? North America's troubles are paltry and few when compared to the atrocities of war.
It's true. We do have it relatively easy over here. Most of us have the necessities of life, if not all the amenities, and we haven't seen actual combat on our soil since the days when every single vegetable was organic. The question is, should we ignore our problems because they pale in comparison to the problems of Iraq or Darfur? Should we shunt articles on our domestic crises to page 3, reserving the headlines solely for Iraqi body counts?
When Don Imus was fired last week, I heard a lot of grumbling that he shouldn't even have made the headlines: Iraq is more important. I agree, Iraq is important...but isn't it at all significant that 40+ years after the civil rights movement and 30 years since women's lib, racism and sexism are still so entrenched in the American psyche that a supposedly intelligent, widely admired radio personality can refer to women as "nappy-headed hos" without batting an eye?
In my opinion, it is. We have selective attention for a reason; so we can observe most keenly that which is happening in our immediate environment and address it. If we're in Iraq, we pay attention primarily to what's going on in Iraq; if we're in Darfur, we focus on what's happening with Darfur. We see our own backyards before we see the streets and houses in the rest of the neighborhood. Does this mean we should be strict isolationists? No. It means we first have to address the most pressing problems in our immediate vicinity. We can't let our own social/political ills fester while we attempt to fight other nations' battles for them. Is this selfish? Maybe it is, to a certain degree. But it's also common sense - the whole plank-vs.-speck thing Christ mentioned, or the airline instructions that tell you to adjust your own oxygen mask before assisting others. School shootings and healthcare might seem insignificant next to wars of aggression, but those are just two of the issues causing grief to millions across North America...and there will be lots more grief if we continue to minimize them.

Which leads me to the topic on which I originally intended to post: Maher Arar's talk in Edmonton this evening, which I attended. I'll have to save that for tomorrow. I haven't had dinner yet, Sophie is hopping around demanding her salad, and Lost will be on soon.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

A very well-reasoned post.

If I remember correctly, 189 people died in bombings in Iraq today. not sure how many of those people were American and how many people were Iraqis, but it puts things in perspective. We have it good here, and yes, our problems are paltry and few comparatively. Not at all diminishing the massacre, but I think you know what I mean.

And yes, I get your point that it doesn't give us an excuse to ignore them either. All we can really do is fix our own problems first. It's common sense.

Well, I'll look forward to your review on the talk. Finally saw Grindhouse, and loved it.

tshsmom said...

Good work kiddo!! Somebody sure raised you right. *patting self on back*
We're sooo PROUD of the way you think things out!

tweetey30 said...

Sme great post.You are right on everything you said here. Things have gotten out of hand and we do need to think things through. I am not usually poilitical here but I do agree with you.

Wandering Coyote said...

Very good post, SME. Looking forward to hearing about the Maher Arar talk, and of course, Lost.

Laura said...

I think what I'm looking for when I gripe about the 24hour news-o-tainment industry is the lack of balance. All three issues- Iraq, VTech, and Imus are newsworthy events... but we certainly don't need to inundated for an entire week with commentary after commentary, cheesy picture montage after montage. They could fit more stories in if they left out all the fluff and didn't harp on the same story day in day out, hour after hour.

S.M. Elliott said...

Laura, so true. The Anna Nicole stuff, for example, warrants maybe 5 minutes per hour of entertainment news time, tops. Instead they'll pad out a full hour with repetition and the same photos we've already seen 50 times apiece.

Notta Wallflower said...

I have no problem with the news coverage of events. What I do have a problem with are these things being aired over and over ad nauseum when other things are happening in the nation and in the world. By the millionth time of seeing something, I have moved past the point of caring. I hate that it's that way, but I think it's set up that way for a reason...

S.M. Elliott said...

I'm afraid it is. Part of the problem is laziness or apathy, I'm sure ("why do two or three stories when we can just milk the Anna Nicole stuff for an hour?"), but I also suspect there's a lot of distraction and noisemaking happening.

Hawkeyi's Blog said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hawkeyi's Blog said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hawkeyi's Blog said...
This comment has been removed by the author.