Let me preface this by explaining I am not a 9/11 "Truther". Richard is. I wanted to attend this conference not only to support him, but to learn more about the movement and its goals. It took place in the Maritime Labour Center just off Hastings - not exactly a scenic area, but at least the "nicer" part of Hastings: Lots of fruit markets, some half-decent chain hotels, a few Starbucks. There was ample parking. The center itself was clean and well-maintained. The main room seats about 500 and is dominated by a vintage fishing mural.
The emcee for the event was Kevin Barrett, a Wisconsin assistant lecturer who stirred up controversy last year by incorporating 9/11 material into his course on Islam at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 9/11 Truth is, I'm sure, an emotional investment for him: He converted to Islam for his wife. Barrett's 20-minute introductory talk was a crash course in 9/11 Truth entitled How Do I Know 9/11 Was an Inside Job?.
This is Barrett's best evidence:
- Larry Silverstein (leaseholder of the World Trade Center) made a multi-billion dollar profit from insurance, and accidentally-on-purpose admitted to PBS that he gave the order to "pull" (demolish) Building 7. This is frequently cited by Truthers.
- A BBC reporter announced the collapse of Building 7 about 20 minutes before it happened (the building was still clearly visible behind her).
- The U.S. has a long history of using false flag operations to trigger wars (including the Spanish-American War, WWI, and WWII). So do other countries.
- 9/11 did not benefit Muslims nor the "guys in caves" (Al Qaeda).
- A Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon.
- Cel phone calls could not have been made from United Flight 93.
- There was a drug bust at the Florida "drug-import" airstrip where Mohomed Atta trained. The hijackers partied with CIA money and CIA cocaine, trained at Army installations, and generally didn't behave anything like fanatical (or even devout) Muslims.
The next speaker was Ian Woods, editor of the 9/11 Truth magazine Global Outlook.
An impromptu poll showed that the audience consisted mostly of Truthers, with roughly 30 of us just seeking more information. According to a poll at 9/11 Blogger, there was a big spike in 9/11 activism in 2006. The movement is growing rapidly.
Woods said we're heading for a bleak future, along the lines of 1984 or Rollerball (in which 7 corporations rule the world). I can't really comment on that. I haven't seen Rollerball.
According to Woods, Canada is in "lockstep" with U.S. policy, but we can stop this madness, beginning with 9/11. "9/11 Truth is the path to peace." (several speakers repeated this sentiment) It is the "neocons' Achilles' Heel". The lie must be uncovered within the next 16-18 months, before Bush leaves office, or it will become almost impossible to "reopen a new investigation" (that phrase doesn't make any sense, but never mind). Why does Woods think it's possible to stop this madness? "Pattern recognition": Recognizing that other grassroots movements have been successful against seemingly insurmountable odds. Examples:
- Cloyoquot Sound (300 protestors prevented clearcutting)
- Bill C-36 was defeated after public opposition
- The MAI/Corporate Rule Treaty was scuttled due to protest.
Woods recommeneded the documentary A Force More Powerful, which covers successful populist movements in history.
Reasons why the lie can be defeated:
- 23 Truth conferences so far
- experts' support
- popular support
- enough evidence
- the movement is now a mainstream political reality
Woods's conclusion: There is a mainstream media cover-up of the movement, because Davi Germbag is the media and the media is tied to the military-industrial complex. The solution is to become the media.
The third speaker was Dr. Joe Hawkins, a thirtysomething chiropracter from Winnipeg who started one of the most popular Canadian Truth websites, stoplying.ca. He wanted to speak about the psychospiritual aspects of 9/11 Truth, but had no prepared speech. So he gave a sort of personal testimonial and an overview of the Canadian Truth scene, made up of what he calls "enlightened people". He started out by welcoming anyone from CSIS. He was emotional and barely coherent.
Dr. Hawkins became part of the movement in 2003, after viewing In Plane Sight. He is now a full-time Truther, having shut down his practice. Somehow, the natural health movement prepared him for his current work. He talked of heroes like John O'Neill ("It's a bad novel, but it's real"), courage, "something higher." He considers himself not a Canadian national, but a "free spirit on the face of the earth." It's his opinion that a New World Order is imminent, if not here already, and that "the nation of Canada will "soon be no more" because "dark forces" are committing genocide, and how are we to explain this to the next generation?
He gave lists of Canadian Truth experts, websites, books, organizations, and radio programs. He mentioned the firing of John Gleason of the Winnipeg Sun. He referred to Truthers as "the white rose of WWII...that's what you are; look it up." Then he says a friend in Winnipeg wants to stage a citizens' arest of 300 MLAs. "We are living in a fascist dictatorship," he concluded. Applause.
Barrett referred to this "speech" as "wonderfully heartfelt". I wondered about Hawkins's mental stability. Who comes to a conference without a prepared speech? The talk he gave was disjointed and largely meaningless, with many gaps, pauses, and abrupt jumps.
Friday's keynote speaker was Webster Tarpley (pictured), a historian who used to be involved with the Lyndon LaRouche org, and co-author of The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush [Sr.]. I actually read excerpts of this a few years ago. Tarpley looks and sounds somewhat like Mr. Lebowski, but has a killer vocab and a wicked sense of humor: An exceptional speaker.
His three main points:
1. Military drills enabled the events of 9/11. They were, in fact, used as covers for the events. When a simulated hijackings occurred simultaneously with actual hijackings that morning, air traffic controllers had extreme difficulty sorting real-world events from exercises. An unprecedented number of drills - at least 25 - were occurring on 9/11.
2. War on Iran could lead to nuclear war.
3. Vladimir Putin has shown willingness to go to war with the U.S., though he is striving to avert WWIII, and reconciliation with Russia should be sought. Tarpley quoted extensively from Putin's February '07 speech in Munich, believing him to be the "most intelligent head of state." That may be so, but he's also evil. I mean, if you want to talk about false flag ops (as all the speakers did), let's start with the Moscow apartment bombings - blamed on the Chechens, but possibly committed by members of the FSB (the successor of the KGB).
Other points:
Canada is in a bad position because of NATO membership. NATO intelligence assassinated Aldo Moro (the Red Brigades being a front for NATO). NORAD isn't good, either. It's full of "moles".
Tarpley's Evidence that 9/11 was an Inside Job:
- The WTC "exploded in midair", its superstrong steel columns obviously cut with thermite.
- A Boeing 757 did not strike the Pentagon, evidenced by the angle of the crash, the small entry hole, and the incompetence of the alleged pilot (Hani Hanjour). A drone plane or a missile caused the damage.
- The fragments of United 93 were too scattered to have been the result of a crash. It seems to have exploded in mid-air.
- The BBC ("an MI6 tool") reported the collapse of Building 7 before it happened.
- The threat to Air Force One, "Angel is next", was given by someone in top levels of goverment, because "Angel" as a top-secret codeword for Air Force One.
- Fiduciary Trust computer consultants were called to a morning meeting on the 79th floor of WTC 1 on 9/11. Six Oracle computer consultants died. Were they "liquidated" because they knew too much?
Drills were used as a cover for the events of 9/11:
Tarpley also offered up a few little gems in his talk.
6 comments:
'Amendment XXV contains an "insanity clause" that could allow Cheney to take the reigns of government.'
This is perhaps the most frigtening thing you said. However, the next sentence:
'Bush and Cheney are merely tools of the invisible government, particularly Bush. Evidence: Cheney was hustled to the bunker on 9/11. Bush was not.'
is interesting. Considering Cheney's actions since entering the VP's office I wouldn't be completely suprised if it turned out to true. Who knows how government really works...?
Sounds like the conference was interesting. Not sure how I feel about some of the things the speakers were claiming as evidence though. If nothing else, it certainly makes people think.
Great report/post! Thanks
A lot of the evidence was repeated by later speakers. Most of them insist it can't be explained away, but I think much of it can be...for instance, the Beeb reporter who said Building 7 collapsed before it did was clearly unfamiliar with the New York skyline and probably mistook "It's going to fall" for "It fell." Firemen and police were warning for hours that it could collapse, after all. And Larry Silverstein's "pull it" could easily, as he says, just have meant "pull the firefighting effort".
I would be totally unsurprised if Bush was out of the loop on most major decisions. He's a little too duuuhhh to be trusted.
Cel phone calls could not have been made from United Flight 93.
Huh? You can make cell phone calls from an airplane. They just don't want you to because they want to charge you to use their stupid service, those lame phones in front of you instead of your own.
As for Bush not being hustled into a bunker, at least they understand he's worthless. ;)
The fragments of United 93 were too scattered to have been the result of a crash. It seems to have exploded in mid-air.
Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if it was shot down by our planes. I'm no conspiracy nut, and I don't believe 9/11 was an inside job. But I wouldn't be surprised if they had orders to shoot it down when they saw where it was heading.
The thing is, hindsight is 20/20. Who knows if our people would have taken that plane back? We might have saved lives by shooting it down, we might not have. I just know if I were the pilot and had the orders, I couldn't pull the trigger.
I'm confused about the cel phone thing. Some people insist they can't possibly work above 8000 feet, and others say they work just fine. It's not something I've ever tried myself.
As for a shoot-down...I wish. I don't think the gov had it together enough that day to shoot down a freakin' bicycle.
non military brain dead chicken hawks advising the govt , hey rubino get yourself a job you freeloading extortionist.
There is another 9/11 truth theory, that is both consistent with the economic motives evidence, and the idea of false flag, yet fundamentally divergent as an explanation of who and why. It traces the history and organization, funding, of Al-Qaeda; to a London centered Anglo-Gulf consortium, affiliated with rogue MI6 elements and the Iraqi National Congress-Chalabi.
see the video-9/11 syndicate :
http://www.livevideo.com/video/6F455B10E3AC4C709CD4BA309719DA74/9-11-syndicate-the-other-9-.aspx
Post a Comment